The Surgeon General has determined that some posts on this forum contain traces of exaggeration for dramatic effect. These will only affect consumers with a sense-of-humour bypass. (So not us, right?)
Two gallons?
I mentioned this because it took me almost a year to realise that what was happening was that the motor was breathing through the dynamo gap, probably because it was less restricted than the route via the timed breather. So I added a bit more restriction to that path, to encourage breathing by the designed route. Another way is to fit a mainshaft seal, but that would have reduced the ESA thrust area, and mine was already worn. I've since been told that there is a way round this, but by then it wasn't a problem.
Two gallons?
I mentioned this because it took me almost a year to realise that what was happening was that the motor was breathing through the dynamo gap, probably because it was less restricted than the route via the timed breather. So I added a bit more restriction to that path, to encourage breathing by the designed route. Another way is to fit a mainshaft seal, but that would have reduced the ESA thrust area, and mine was already worn. I've since been told that there is a way round this, but by then it wasn't a problem.