You can see why the passenger's bum gets such a paddling on a rough road . Bad passenger!!;-)
Looks like about 4" total movement in both the front and rear.When fiddling about with measurements before building the Glenli rfm, I measured 4.5 inches non progressive movement on the rear of my Rapide. Perhaps the Thornton hits the stops a little bit earlier.
The relationship between spring movement and axle movement in the front end is ideal, to my way of thinking. As Rob mentions, there is progression in the movement, which gives the front end the ability to soak up the millions of small irregularities like a softly sprung setup while retaining the ability to handle a big jarring bump like a firmly sprung setup.
Glen
Very true about the passenger! You can see the rider does not entirely escape either. I went from the standard rear set up to a fully sprung set up with Girling 135 lb/inch springs and my short length/long travel AVO damper in more or less one go. The improvement was therefore massive, but perhaps I am judging the semi sprung seat too harshly, as I have never tried it with the other mods. I shall have to give it a go some time, out of interest.
I agree progressive springing can be good (and I have them on my T160), but the Girdraulics have far, far too much, especially when combined with the steeply rising friction in the link bearings. Modern bikes have gone in the opposite direction, specifically to improve handling, as have I. It is much more comfortable and behaves better under braking.
Rob