Reporting Threads as Offensive

Status
Not open for further replies.

Gene Nehring

Well Known and Active Forum User
VOC Member
I haven’t been to any VOC GCMs or AGMs for the last six years - in the previous 30 years or so I attended most of them. In that time I was usually in the opposite camp to the Exec, being against increasing the membership subscription to facilitate the constant race to increase the size of MPH, building up the Clubs’ cash balance to an unnecessary amount, buying property, getting in too deep in financing the Spares Company, the constant rush to propose new Honorary Members to the point of rivalling the House of Lords and many other issues. Occasionally I won, mostly I lost. I’ve had more arguments with Andy Everett and Tim Kirker than all the present posters on this subject put together. In true democratic style, the members at these meetings could stand up and say what they liked without being castigated for their opinion as long as they accepted the vote when everyone else had their say.

On this Forum some posters use a variety of methods to discredit people who don’t agree with what they say and using just a surname immediately shows no respect for the person’s opinion; employing tricks perfected by trolls and gutter press all over the world to undermine, misquote or exaggerate the victim’s words. Not only do the Exec members get abused but we are now moving into the actual irrelevance of the positions they hold within the VOC in this brave new world of the internet.

Alyn Vincent has recently (with a total lack of self-awareness) explained to us how to have civilized debate. I live in a Yorkshire mining area and am not fazed by the language used in Australia and the Welsh valleys where he obviously perfected his prose, but the Forum is not the place to use it.

Just to get some context, I am led to believe that about 200 VOC members (including me) use the Forum, with a couple of dozen penning most of the dissatisfaction. The other 2000 or so probably have no idea, or care about, who runs it or if it continues, so let’s not get carried away with statements such as being potentially the VOCs biggest section - a little pee in a big pond. Governments and banks all want to do away with cash as available technology has made it obsolete, it will happen, but the timing has to be right. The same applies with the VOC, in the not too distant future the membership will vote for a move online, that’s respecting democracy.

I earlier said I was worried this subject would split the VOC; I’m now starting to believe it is the intention of a few - helped along the way by others - that can’t see it coming.

Before anyone asks, I don’t think Tim Kirker was having a rant, he put forward a counter argument against Graham’s nomination as is the custom, and he lost. So it was put forward to the AGM as the majority voted, so why have we had constant bile from his supporters ever since that besmirches the image of the VOC?

Having watched the video I think Arthur Farrow was VERY calm, not ranting as claimed. His inference that Graham’s bike collection needed looking into will need proof; if he can’t provide it he should issue a formal apology.

Just a thought, why are some posters so keen for Graham to be made an Honorary Member of a Club they have no respect for

I hope any replies will reflect what I have said, not what they think or imagine I have said.

Vince Farrell
Tim and Vince,

It was not Alyn who made the point about debate and the conduct of debate. It was me. Vince, not so long ago in an unrelated conversation a large number of people on the forum switched to using their real names and mine is there for all to see.

I am trying to persuade each of us to reflect on what we are saying, as we all know once you say something it cant be taken back. I hope that cooler heads can prevail, I love this club. I don't know Graham all that well and I don't know Tim, Arthur or Phil either. I don't have a grudge to bear or skin in the game

In my experience when there are heated debates or arguments in order to fully understand the points of both parties you have to step into the shoes of those that have opposing views to your own.

This current division in the Club over the forum looks to me like this. We as a Club did not have a Computer Officer for the longest time. Members of the EC and Club were running the computer systems as there was no dedicated person or person's to supervise the systems. Graham being the editor of MPH stepped up and offered to create a forum for all members to use. He obviously was enjoying what he was doing and worked very hard to give the membership a quality resource. Graham donated many, many hours from what I can see to make MPH and the forum what they are today. At some point in the last couple of years two things have happened, the club has found someone who has volunteered to take up the mantel of Computer Officer, awesome. The club has decided now that we have a Computer Officer that we can look to update and streamline our computer systems, again awesome.

However this is where things take a turn for the worst. Phil Mahood in his position as Computer Officer is tasked by the EC with finding a replacement computer system for the club . In the search for a new computer system Phil finds Club Express through conversations with the head of the AMCA. Phil takes the CE platform to our EC and explains how it works and why it would be of benefit. This is a good thing for the most part. Phil then presents a working version of Club Express to the GC and EC it seems to work well and combines most of our systems into one. The one major issue is the forum on CE is sub standard and this is obvious to Graham who has spent years refining the current forum for the membership. Graham expresses that the forum is sub par and is thinking not of himself but the many hundreds of people that currently use the forum. The Computer Officer tries to dispel the weakness of the CE forum as he has taken ownership of the programme he is putting forward and believes given time that we might be able to migrate the current forum over. Migrating the forum to CE proves almost impossible and we are left with a pickle, Graham feels unheard and upset as he knows the CE forum will not match the standard of the existing forum. That leaves us in a position where both Graham and the EC are at an impasse, all are proud and loyal club members. The majority of the EC decide to use Club Express and that the current forum can stay in place until CE can provide something better. Graham resigns.

I know other things have been expressed by all parties and that blame can be allocated to both sides. Heated arguments often leave us regretting what we have said and from the video footage it seems to me thats the case. I don't think either party wakes up each day and says to themselves how much evil can I do today. All the people concerned have the best interests of the club they love at heart. It again requires listening and working together to try to resolve these issues.

People on this forum just want to know that the EC will do as promised and leave the forum alone until such time as it can migrated to the other platform seamlessly or if it can't that it will remain as is. If it were added to the minutes of the next meeting or tabled in writing in MPH by the Chairman that might help.

Best,

Gene.
 
Last edited:

Chris.R

Well Known and Active Forum User
VOC Member
Well said Gene if that is the way of it there is much to agree with, I have largely sat this one out as a newby I was last a member in the 60s. when I last owned a Vincent. I have listened a lot. I attend three sections Surrey, North Kent and South London, I therefore have had the pleasure of knowing Graham and respect the work he has hitherto done on our behalf, I will call that monumental. Never knowingly terminally upset a volunteer is a motto I know well having been a club journal editor for just about 40 years. I have had correspondence wth Phil and think I know him as an honest member trying to do his best for the VOC members. I cannot see how an association with 2000 members can have 4294 at the latest count on its forum there must be a large proportion of users that are not members of the VOC.

The forum is a truly valuable resource built diligently over many years with many threads to it, lose just one link and it becomes greatly devalued it has to be so. It is imperitive that the forum ports over to a new system intact if it does not then the transfer must not be attempted until it can.

Further I have to say the Forum and the journal MPH are the glue that binds VOC together in any coherent way remember that Graham manages the P.O. Box only because he and the late Andy Everitt felt it the most practical option at the time to reduce costs. It is rightly pointed out that there will be more costs put upon the membership moving to a business - Club Express - that are only in it for the money. Our executive which seems particularly quiet on that matter should think very carefully before raising subscriptions to cover what some may consider grandiose ideas.

I have long said that those who take money from us should take less and use it more wisely.

Also the executive should think very carefully about what they have in some quarters encouraged, and that is put simply - The character assination of to many the most active and high profile volunteer the club has:

Should it prove to be the case then those responsible must be ashamed of themselves.

Chris
 

Chris.R

Well Known and Active Forum User
VOC Member
Tim and Vince,

It was not Alyn who made the point about debate and the conduct of debate. It was me. Vince, not so long ago in an unrelated conversation a large number of people on the forum switched to using their real names and mine is there for all to see.

I am trying to persuade each of us to reflect on what we are saying, as we all know once you say something it cant take it back. I hope that cooler heads can prevail, I love this club. I don't know Graham all that well and I don't know Tim, Arthur or Phil either. I don't have a grudge to bare or skin in the game

I think that when there are heated debates or arguments that in order to fully understand the points of both parties you have to step into shoes of those that have opposing views.

This current division in the Club over the forum looks to me like this. We as a Club did not have a Computer Officer for the longest time. Members of the EC and Club were running the computer systems as there was no dedicated person or person's to supervise the systems. Graham being the editor of MPH stepped up and offered to create a forum for all members to use. He obviously was enjoying what he was doing and worked very hard to give the membership a quality resource. Graham donated many, many hours from what I can see to make MPH and the forum what they are today. At some point in the last couple of years two things have happened, the club has found someone who has volunteered to take up the mantel of Computer Officer, awesome. The club has decided now that we have a Computer Officer that we can look to update and streamline our computer systems, again awesome.

However this is where things take a turn for the worst. Phil Mahood in his position as Computer Officer is tasked with finding a replacement computer system for the club . In the search for a new computer system Phil finds Club Express through conversations with the head of the AMCA. Phil takes the CE platform to our EC and explains how it works and why it would be of benefit. This is a good thing for the most part. Phil then presents a working version of Club Express to the GC and EC it seems to work well and combines most of our systems into one. The one major issue is the forum on CE is sub standard and this is obvious to Graham who has spent years refining the current forum for the membership. Graham expresses that the forum is sub par and is thinking not of himself but the many hundreds of people that currently use the forum. The Computer Officer tries to dispel the weakness of the CE forum as he has taken ownership of the programme he is putting forward and believes given time that we might be able to migrate the current forum over. Migrating the forum to CE proves almost impossible and we are left with a pickle as now Graham feels unheard and upset as he knows the CE forum will not match the standard of the existing forum. We are left with a position where both Graham and the EC are at an impasse, all are proud and loyal club members. The majority of the EC decide to use Club Express and that the current forum can stay in place until CE can provide something better. Graham resigns.

I know other things have been expressed by all parties and that blame can be allocated to both sides. Heated arguments often leave us regretting what we have said and from the video footage it seems to me thats the case. I don't think either party wakes up each day and says to themselves how much evil can I do today. All the people concerned have the best interests of the club they love at heart. It again requires listening and working together to try to resolve these issues.

People on this forum just want to know that the EC will do as promised and leave the forum alone until such time as it can migrated to the other platform seamlessly or if it can't that it will remain as is. If it were added to the minutes of the next meeting or tabled in writing in MPH by the Chairman that might help.

Best,

Gene.
Gene have you comunicated your thoughts directly to Phil Mahood?
 

Vince Farrell

Well Known and Active Forum User
VOC Member
Just a quick one on Numbers Vince,
At the bottom of the page it says , Web Site members 4,294 ?,
I am not good at these things , But I have been in the Club for over 50 years ,
So think I can have an Opinion too.
Cheers Bill.

Also as I have said before, A hell of a lot goes on , via P.M. s,
I think some people don't want to air there dirty washing in front of everybody ?.

So we know 4294 people have logged on to the website at sometime ,but you say not all are members.
You responded to my post when I said I had been told about 200 VOC members used the Forum, could someone let us all know just what the number is?

You suggest these 4394 are website members, I wasn't aware looking at the website gave any kind of membership status.

Vince Farrell
 

timetraveller

Well Known and Active Forum User
VOC Member
"Oh still small voice of calm . . ."
Well you've tried latin and now a quotation from a christian hymn. What next? Perhaps something with a little more fire in its belly.
 

Bill Thomas

Well Known and Active Forum User
VOC Member
Vince , Just scroll down on this page, "Website Statistics " We try to get them to join the VOC,
If they need much info,
I have met people on the road, At the coast who have had a look in on the Forum,
Good starting point for new members ?.
Cheers Bill.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top