I fitted one of these BNR belt drives on the 1360. The two main reasons for using it were weight reduction and the ability to transmit a lot of power. There was some question as to whether a stock clutch was up to the job.
Bob was also unsure if his clutch would do it, so he suggested using 7 thin friction plates rather than the 5 thicker plates he normally uses on a Vincent clutch. At least with the BNR clutch you have the option of tightening the springs or using heavier springs if the clutch isn't holding.
Bob also made the gearing slightly higher than standard Vincent primary, which meant clearance had to be created in all directions.
The clutch holds but I had to really cinch the springs down to stop slippage. It is not a light clutch.
I made a 1" spacer to go behind the primary cover. That might create a lean over issue on a standard bike, but my engine is shifted 5/8" to the right for rear tire clearance, so it's not a problem at all on this bike. Also, it's an Egli type frame so the engine sits just a bit higher than in a standard Vincent.
I like the BNR belt drive on that bike, but can't see a good enough reason to fit one on a standard roadbike. There are high quality triplex chains available, but you have to search a bit for the source.
The nonsealed bearing on the BNR clutch has not been a problem. I removed the bearing cover ring and inspected the bearing at 1500 miles. The grease was all intact. Whatever grease Bob uses seems right for the job, it stays in. I have about 10,000 miles on the drive now. I should inspect it again just to make sure it's OK. If all of the grease is still in there after this much use, I'll not bother looking at it again for a long while.
My 920 Norton belt drive is a different brand. It uses a sealed bearing, which should be a good thing. I took that clutch off after the first five hundred miles of use. All of the grease had slipped past the seal and was splattered all over things!
Glen