The Spares Company
Club Shop/Regalia
Parent Website
Contact Officials
Machine Registrar
Club Secretary
Membership Secretaries
MPH Editor and Forum Administrator.
Section Newsletters
Technical Databases
Photos
Home
What's new
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Information
Bike Modifications
Machine Data Services
Manufacturers Manuals
Spare Parts Listings
Technical Diagrams
Whitakerpedia (Vincent Wiki)
The Club
MPH Material Archive
Flogger's Corner
Obituaries
VOC Sections
Local Sections
Local Section Newsletters
Miscellaneous
Club Assets
Club History
Club Rules
Machine Data Services
Meeting Documents
Miscellaneous
Essential Reading
Magazine/Newspaper Articles/Letters
Adverts and Sales Brochures
The Mighty Garage Videos
Bikes For Sale (Spares Company)
Log in
Register
What's new
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Forums: Public Access
General Chat (Vincent Related)
Whatever next?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="ClassicBiker" data-source="post: 77411" data-attributes="member: 1632"><p>I would cheerfully sign but as I'm sitting here comfortably in the states and I think it might invalidate it. This strikes me as absurd. Being that when competing in organized motor sport events competitors sign waivers acknowledging that motor sport is inherently dangerous and damage to themselves and their toys is their problem and the organizers and other competitors are blameless. If they sign said waiver I think it's rather silly to expect anyone to pay damages if your toys or you get broken. The other thing I find absurd is a court directing what laws need to be written, "courts" interpret the meaning/intent of laws, possibly determine the validity of laws, award compensation for damages, determine guilt, and sentence accordingly. Courts do not direct governments what laws need to be written or enacted. People determine how they wish to be governed not mandated to. This is an assault on national sovereignty to say the least. Though undoubtedly now that this foolishness has been voiced someone here will think it's good idea and push for it here.</p><p>Sad little people with sad little ideas.</p><p>Steven</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="ClassicBiker, post: 77411, member: 1632"] I would cheerfully sign but as I'm sitting here comfortably in the states and I think it might invalidate it. This strikes me as absurd. Being that when competing in organized motor sport events competitors sign waivers acknowledging that motor sport is inherently dangerous and damage to themselves and their toys is their problem and the organizers and other competitors are blameless. If they sign said waiver I think it's rather silly to expect anyone to pay damages if your toys or you get broken. The other thing I find absurd is a court directing what laws need to be written, "courts" interpret the meaning/intent of laws, possibly determine the validity of laws, award compensation for damages, determine guilt, and sentence accordingly. Courts do not direct governments what laws need to be written or enacted. People determine how they wish to be governed not mandated to. This is an assault on national sovereignty to say the least. Though undoubtedly now that this foolishness has been voiced someone here will think it's good idea and push for it here. Sad little people with sad little ideas. Steven [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What was Mr Vincent's Christian Name?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Forums: Public Access
General Chat (Vincent Related)
Whatever next?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top