If there would be a straight path leading to a reliable magneto, which to me is equivalent with a reliable HV wiring, ...
My observation is that most of the "unreliable" reputation magnetos have with some people is a direct result of magneto repairers who didn't know what they're doing. As detailed in one of the Appendices of my restoration thread, the type of less-expensive condenser developed at the time of WWII, as a result of lack of access to a supply of Indian mica, has a limited lifetime due to the internal chemistry of the components.
When the original condensers inevitably started failing, people who didn't understand there is more to a capacitor than capacitance started installing ones lacking the capability to handle the large pulsed currents generated in a magneto. Articles were written in various places, including 'MPH', recommending capacitors that were doomed to fail. Other articles in 'MPH', including one by an electrical engineer who shall remain nameless, made other faulty recommendations. Further, even if a correct replacement capacitor is used, the inevitable reduction in magnetism when an armature is removed results in reduced performance of the magneto. Instead of having enough spark to start an engine at 300 rpm, it requires older men with weaker knees to kick harder than when they were 18. Some magneto restorers still insist an "internal keeper" design keeps the magnetization from dropping when the armature is removed. This only would be the case if you believe in magic, not physics.
In most cases, I assume that someone who recommends "rewinding" a magneto doesn't understand magnetos. Failure of the windings does happen, but it's fairly uncommon, can easily be tested with appropriate equipment, so isn't a prime suspect when there are problems. Some years ago I "inherited" a large quantity of disassembled magnetos. I have no way of knowing what failure caused each of them to have been disassembled, but most of the coils are fine. If I were rebuilding a magneto with a bad coil, I would use one of those old Lucas armatures (after stress-testing it) rather than an armature rewound by some unknown person who may or may not know what they are doing.
A properly rebuilt Lucas magneto will be very reliable for decades, requiring a minimum of infrequent maintenance (lube the points cam, clean the earth ring, replace the brushes, etc.). More reliable than a battery-dependent ignition system, since those depend on a battery that can and will die after a few years, and when it's most inconvenient. A properly rebuilt magneto is more reliable than any electronic ignition system as well, since in the end all of them depend on an undependable battery.
Leave a magneto-equipped bike sit for a year, add fresh gasoline, tickle, choke, retard the spark, and reasonably expect it to start on the first kick. Try that with a bike that relies on a battery for the spark, even if it has been connected to a charger the entire time. In the latter case you
hope it will start, while in the former case you can reasonably
expect it to.