And should the other dimension on the sketch be 8" (20.3cm) or 7 7/8"?As your old Vincent is imperial, it`s 16 3/4".
Ray
And should the other dimension on the sketch be 8" (20.3cm) or 7 7/8"?As your old Vincent is imperial, it`s 16 3/4".
The old frame on the seat, i dont know. I got it with the pile of parts i bought as a "bike"...My two frames are both 425 mm. Who made the frame in the photos? Cheers, Stu.
Ah, sanity at last!
The Triumph 21 a unit construction 350 was introduced in 1957. It was also the 21st year of the establishment of the Triumph Engineering Co. Ltd. In 1936 Jack Sangster bought the motorcycle side of the Triumph Motor Co.. So it was a double meaning 21 cubic inches introduced on the 21st anniversary.It's a bit like poetry it never translates properly from its native tongue the Vincent was built by imperial measuring with the normal dispensation to the French because they did play with engines around 1900 so we kept their bore and stroke apart from USA where cubic inches ruled.
So if it was built with inches it's only sensible to use inches thankfully with a digital guage and metric dials on the lathe I can use the devils stick but I certainly try and describe Vincent's in their proper tongue
As for cc, being a bit of a triumph fan I remember that 350cc. Is 21 cubic inches I wonder why?