Correct. Note the wos, where it says: " exhaust: low exhaust" this was due to its sidecar use without bankingGreat pictures, thank you.
Note: To me it looks like the pipes are side by side at this time of racing...
with solo use.
Correct. Note the wos, where it says: " exhaust: low exhaust" this was due to its sidecar use without bankingGreat pictures, thank you.
Note: To me it looks like the pipes are side by side at this time of racing...
Matching comparison timewiseAmazing that someone with racing experience would think that the sprung rear end was a disadvantage for sure he can never have raced in the rain against ridged bikes. In my experience, that is when the RFM really comes into its own.
Still think of how long it took Trials riders to get the sprung rear end message there is a lot of inertia in clubroom attitudes and I think even more back then and earlier for instance after all my wifes 1925 EW Douglas has an automatic oil pump but it would not sell without a swichable separate circuit and a manual pump because that was the perceived method .
Note the difference in exhaust pipes diameter between historical fotos and and auction fotos here:Correct. Note the wos, where it says: " exhaust: low exhaust" this was due to its sidecar use without banking
with solo use.
Tester Alan CathcartWho was the Brave lad riding, Standing up on the rests, With the forks right down !.
Super Shot.
Ernst, that does set a standard, I have all the parts necessary to start my Lightning but it won't have a Works Order Form like yours but will have all original factory parts, previous machine registrar Gordon thinks it could have been a Cooper car eng ine as it only has matching HRD c/case numbers. The dilemma is what forks to fit for best handling, Brampton's or modified girdraulics with concentric bottom links?
bananaman.