Enough has been written about breathers certainly I thought all aspects had been done to death .
In my mind I had long ago settled for a ball or reed valve system from exhaust or inlet (or both on a twin) top spring cap leading to a racing regulation catch tank thats always worked for me and the racers. and enterprising experimenters with french letters had proved to me that after a start up the air flow became almost zero and negative pressure ruled in the crankcase. and that of course ment less resistance on the power stroke, all good stuff
And then today I read in a 1989 article in classic bike about a drag racer with a sophisticated breather valve system he had introduced on his Norton because "a negative pressure in the crankcase works against the upward movement of the piston", Of course it does! why has that never been mentioned? have I been wrong all this time? should I go back to timed breathers? crisis! no no not another breather thread
In my mind I had long ago settled for a ball or reed valve system from exhaust or inlet (or both on a twin) top spring cap leading to a racing regulation catch tank thats always worked for me and the racers. and enterprising experimenters with french letters had proved to me that after a start up the air flow became almost zero and negative pressure ruled in the crankcase. and that of course ment less resistance on the power stroke, all good stuff
And then today I read in a 1989 article in classic bike about a drag racer with a sophisticated breather valve system he had introduced on his Norton because "a negative pressure in the crankcase works against the upward movement of the piston", Of course it does! why has that never been mentioned? have I been wrong all this time? should I go back to timed breathers? crisis! no no not another breather thread