Interestingly I haven't tried strapping my Vincent to my back and jumping out of a plane.....but it sounds exciting. In the article from MPH 499 I can see this being an issue if you replace the shoes with new linings on and ground to size as per the brakes on a car. But if the shoes with oversize linings are installed per normal using a shim either side of the cam and machining the linings in the lathe to suit the I/D of the drum, I always find this works ok. Although some lining materials work better than some others. Some or others may know that you can actually lengthen the linings by around 30 mm per shoe by welding up the small depression at the end of the standard area, radius the welded area to follow the shape of the shoe, and bond on longer linings......It will help, and after all, a Vincent needs all the brakes it can get.....I always say, "They go far better than they stop". Greg.
Machining with a spacer in the cam face, only doubles the error when its`s assembled. You need to grasp geometry to be able to understand what actually happens. But I have a cutaway set up that shows exactly what happens, so you can see the shoe bending. Just for example you turn the shoe with a ten thou shim in there, then turn to give five thou clearance, that means that when you remove the shim there will be 15 thou clearance at the cam, but five thou at the pivot. So on operation the cam will move the shoe, the pivot end will touch before the cam end.
Personally I think it would be better to turn the shoe with ten thou clearance, then ADD a shim of five thou. on assembly.
Think about levers and loads, when the cam is applied, that should be the place that it touches first, adjacent to the cam. so how can a brake plate distort, only when the load is somewhere else. Would you believe it`s at the pivot pin ?
Once again I`ll ask the experts to advise, but remember, it`s your brakes.