The Spares Company
Club Shop/Regalia
Parent Website
Contact Officials
Machine Registrar
Club Secretary
Membership Secretaries
MPH Editor and Forum Administrator.
Section Newsletters
Technical Databases
Photos
Home
What's new
Latest activity
Forums
New posts
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Information
Bike Modifications
Machine Data Services
Manufacturers Manuals
Spare Parts Listings
Technical Diagrams
Whitakerpedia (Vincent Wiki)
The Club
MPH Material Archive
Flogger's Corner
Obituaries
VOC Sections
Local Sections
Local Section Newsletters
Miscellaneous
Club Assets
Club History
Club Rules
Machine Data Services
Meeting Documents
Miscellaneous
Essential Reading
Magazine/Newspaper Articles/Letters
Adverts and Sales Brochures
The Mighty Garage Videos
Bikes For Sale (Spares Company)
Log in
Register
What's new
New posts
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Home
Forums
Forums: Public Access
Tech. Advice: Series 'B' / 'C' 500cc/1000cc Bikes
Complete Restoration of a Black Shadow
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Magnetoman" data-source="post: 127732" data-attributes="member: 2806"><p>An expression I learned many years ago is "half of knowledge is knowing where to find it." My original post in this thread mentioned my concern that, while a thread already may exist on the VOC Forum doing exactly what I asked about, the search engine made it impossible, not just to find it if it <em>does</em> exist, but even to determine if it <em>doesn't</em> exist. I consider that to be a major downside to posting my rebuild here. However, as someone suggested, this easily might be solved if Graham added a "Major Projects" section (as opposed to minor projects, like rebuilding a head, adjusting a clutch, relining brakes, etc.).</p><p></p><p>Having had experience with web sites crashing, or the internet connection dropping and losing what I had written before I could hit 'send', for years I've done it the opposite way. I write and edit on Word and then upload the final content when I'm happy with it.</p><p></p><p> As an indication of the scope of what I'm discussing, the thread about rebuilding the 1928 Ariel mentioned in my first post is a Word document that is 278 single-spaced pages long in 10 point font with only small thumbnails of the embedded photographs. The folder containing images (most of which aren't in that thread because of the site's 5 images/post limit) has 1972 photographs.</p><p></p><p>My graduate students and postdocs working on a given project were, almost by definition, truly the world's experts on whatever the topic was of a given manuscript. But, the final published result always benefited by having been critically read by the others in my group who were working on related projects. That's why the idea of a blog, which because of internet realities would have to be locked to outside comments, isn't reasonable.</p><p></p><p>As an aside, I've had a <em>lot</em> of experience with writing, having books and manuscripts published, maintaining web pages, and posting motorcycle restoration threads. Despite that experience, the question I posted at the start of this thread has resulted in a number of valuable suggestions. Which is exactly why I posted that question. If I didn't expect there to be a number of excellent suggestions to the content of my Vincent restoration thread that influenced how I proceeded with it, I certainly wouldn't take the time to write it.</p><p></p><p>As for access to more than one source, immediately after buying the Vincent I compiled a bespoke shop manual consisting of tabbed sections with every piece of technical information I could find in my collection of books and magazines.</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH=full]37361[/ATTACH]</p><p></p><p>The tabbed sections in the four binders of that manual roughly correspond to chapters and sub-chapters in Richardson and KNB.</p><p></p><p>As I've done with similar manuals I made for other bikes I restored, I don't try to edit material before adding it, so each tabbed section contains a mix of correct, incorrect, redundant, and obsolete information, as well as alternative approaches to achieve the same end result. I mentally edit the material in real time as I work on whatever is covered by a particular section.</p><p></p><p>Whenever new information has appeared since I first set up that manual, I added it, causing it to swell to its current size. For example, some years ago I acquired a fairly complete set of 'MPH' dating back to the first issue in 1949 which, in addition to having articles with technical information that I added to the manual, also had articles describing useful special tools, all of which I then made. Also, I should mention '40 Years On' and 'Another Ten Years'.</p><p></p><p>I should say I am interested in "reasonable," not perpetual longevity. The problem is that web sites come and go so even seemingly-robust ones have disappeared overnight. Even where a web site hasn't disappeared, often software upgrades have caused information to effectively become unavailable. A few years ago Photobucket abruptly changed its policy on hosting images, with devastating impact on a number of other sites that relied on it. Interestingly, nearly 600 years after Guttenberg, paper copies produced in multiple copies still are the gold standard of 'permanent'.</p><p></p><p>Don't set your hopes too high. While, ideally, my restoration would proceed in a step-by-step sequence like, say, the chapters in Richardson or KNB, somehow that's never been quite the case for any of my previous restorations. The 278 pages of my Ariel restoration contain everything needed to be, by far, the most complete restoration manual for a 1928 Ariel, but to reorganize the contents into a step-by-step manual would require a <em>lot</em> of time.</p><p></p><p>That's an important point. Given the considerable effort creating such a restoration thread represents, part of the implicit (or explicit) "contract" with wherever I post it is that my judgment of what constitutes reasonable content has to prevail. As an example, although I barely mentioned the word "motorcycle" in the following post, I consider its content to be reasonable.</p><p></p><p>[URL unfurl="true"]http://www.britbike.com/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/507557/re-1957-bsa-spitfire-scrambler#Post507557[/URL]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Magnetoman, post: 127732, member: 2806"] An expression I learned many years ago is "half of knowledge is knowing where to find it." My original post in this thread mentioned my concern that, while a thread already may exist on the VOC Forum doing exactly what I asked about, the search engine made it impossible, not just to find it if it [I]does[/I] exist, but even to determine if it [I]doesn't[/I] exist. I consider that to be a major downside to posting my rebuild here. However, as someone suggested, this easily might be solved if Graham added a "Major Projects" section (as opposed to minor projects, like rebuilding a head, adjusting a clutch, relining brakes, etc.). Having had experience with web sites crashing, or the internet connection dropping and losing what I had written before I could hit 'send', for years I've done it the opposite way. I write and edit on Word and then upload the final content when I'm happy with it. As an indication of the scope of what I'm discussing, the thread about rebuilding the 1928 Ariel mentioned in my first post is a Word document that is 278 single-spaced pages long in 10 point font with only small thumbnails of the embedded photographs. The folder containing images (most of which aren't in that thread because of the site's 5 images/post limit) has 1972 photographs. My graduate students and postdocs working on a given project were, almost by definition, truly the world's experts on whatever the topic was of a given manuscript. But, the final published result always benefited by having been critically read by the others in my group who were working on related projects. That's why the idea of a blog, which because of internet realities would have to be locked to outside comments, isn't reasonable. As an aside, I've had a [I]lot[/I] of experience with writing, having books and manuscripts published, maintaining web pages, and posting motorcycle restoration threads. Despite that experience, the question I posted at the start of this thread has resulted in a number of valuable suggestions. Which is exactly why I posted that question. If I didn't expect there to be a number of excellent suggestions to the content of my Vincent restoration thread that influenced how I proceeded with it, I certainly wouldn't take the time to write it. As for access to more than one source, immediately after buying the Vincent I compiled a bespoke shop manual consisting of tabbed sections with every piece of technical information I could find in my collection of books and magazines. [ATTACH type="full" alt="040ShopManual.jpg"]37361[/ATTACH] The tabbed sections in the four binders of that manual roughly correspond to chapters and sub-chapters in Richardson and KNB. As I've done with similar manuals I made for other bikes I restored, I don't try to edit material before adding it, so each tabbed section contains a mix of correct, incorrect, redundant, and obsolete information, as well as alternative approaches to achieve the same end result. I mentally edit the material in real time as I work on whatever is covered by a particular section. Whenever new information has appeared since I first set up that manual, I added it, causing it to swell to its current size. For example, some years ago I acquired a fairly complete set of 'MPH' dating back to the first issue in 1949 which, in addition to having articles with technical information that I added to the manual, also had articles describing useful special tools, all of which I then made. Also, I should mention '40 Years On' and 'Another Ten Years'. I should say I am interested in "reasonable," not perpetual longevity. The problem is that web sites come and go so even seemingly-robust ones have disappeared overnight. Even where a web site hasn't disappeared, often software upgrades have caused information to effectively become unavailable. A few years ago Photobucket abruptly changed its policy on hosting images, with devastating impact on a number of other sites that relied on it. Interestingly, nearly 600 years after Guttenberg, paper copies produced in multiple copies still are the gold standard of 'permanent'. Don't set your hopes too high. While, ideally, my restoration would proceed in a step-by-step sequence like, say, the chapters in Richardson or KNB, somehow that's never been quite the case for any of my previous restorations. The 278 pages of my Ariel restoration contain everything needed to be, by far, the most complete restoration manual for a 1928 Ariel, but to reorganize the contents into a step-by-step manual would require a [I]lot[/I] of time. That's an important point. Given the considerable effort creating such a restoration thread represents, part of the implicit (or explicit) "contract" with wherever I post it is that my judgment of what constitutes reasonable content has to prevail. As an example, although I barely mentioned the word "motorcycle" in the following post, I consider its content to be reasonable. [URL unfurl="true"]http://www.britbike.com/forums/ubbthreads.php/topics/507557/re-1957-bsa-spitfire-scrambler#Post507557[/URL] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
What was Mr Vincent's Christian Name?
Post reply
Home
Forums
Forums: Public Access
Tech. Advice: Series 'B' / 'C' 500cc/1000cc Bikes
Complete Restoration of a Black Shadow
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top